loading page

Fast Power Density Assessment of 5G Mobile Handset Using Equivalent Currents Method
  • +7
  • Wang He ,
  • Bo Xu ,
  • Lucia Scialacqua ,
  • Zhinong Ying ,
  • Alessandro Scannavini ,
  • Lars Jacob Foged ,
  • Kun Zhao ,
  • Carla Di Paola ,
  • Shuai Zhang ,
  • Sailing He
Wang He
Centre for Optical and Electromagnetic Research, Centre for Optical and Electromagnetic Research

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Lucia Scialacqua
Author Profile
Zhinong Ying
Author Profile
Alessandro Scannavini
Author Profile
Lars Jacob Foged
Author Profile
Carla Di Paola
Author Profile
Shuai Zhang
Author Profile
Sailing He
Author Profile


As the fifth-generation (5G) mobile communication
is utilizing millimeter-wave (mmWave) frequency bands, electromagnetic field (EMF) exposure emitted from a 5G mmWave mobile handset should be evaluated and compliant with the relevant EMF exposure limits in terms of peak spatial-average incident power density. In this work, a fast power density (PD) assessment method for a 5G mmWave mobile handset using the equivalent currents (EQC) method is proposed. The EQC method utilizes the intermediate-field (IF) data collected by a spherical measurement system to reconstruct the EQCs over a reconstruction surface, and then computes the PD in
close proximity of the mobile handset with acceptable accuracy. The performance of the proposed method is evaluated using a mmWave mobile handset mock-up equipped with four quasi-Yagi antennas. The assessed PD results are compared with those computed using full-wave simulations and also those measured with a planar near-field (NF) scanning system. In addition, three influencing factors related to the accuracy of the EQC method, namely, the angular resolution, the phase error, and the handset
position in the IF measurements, are also analyzed. The proposed method is a good candidate for fast PD assessment of EMF exposure compliance testing in the mmWave frequency range.
Oct 2021Published in IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation volume 69 issue 10 on pages 6857-6869. 10.1109/TAP.2021.3070725