loading page

PV module energy rating standard IEC 61853-3 intercomparison and best practice guidelines for implementation and validation
  • +16
  • Malte Vogt ,
  • Stefan Riechelmann ,
  • Ana Gracia-Amillo ,
  • Anton Driesse ,
  • Alexander Kokka ,
  • Kinza Maham ,
  • Petri Kärhä ,
  • Robert Kenny ,
  • Carsten Schinke ,
  • Karsten Bothe ,
  • James Blakesley ,
  • Esma Music ,
  • Fabian Plag ,
  • Gabi Friesen ,
  • Gianluca Corbellini ,
  • Nicholas Riedel ,
  • Roland Valckenborg ,
  • Markus W Schweiger ,
  • Werner Herrmann
Malte Vogt
TU Delft

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Stefan Riechelmann
Author Profile
Ana Gracia-Amillo
Author Profile
Anton Driesse
Author Profile
Alexander Kokka
Author Profile
Kinza Maham
Author Profile
Petri Kärhä
Author Profile
Robert Kenny
Author Profile
Carsten Schinke
Author Profile
Karsten Bothe
Author Profile
James Blakesley
Author Profile
Esma Music
Author Profile
Fabian Plag
Author Profile
Gabi Friesen
Author Profile
Gianluca Corbellini
Author Profile
Nicholas Riedel
Author Profile
Roland Valckenborg
Author Profile
Markus W Schweiger
Author Profile
Werner Herrmann
Author Profile


The IEC 61853 standard series aims to provide a standardized measure for PV module energy rating, namely the Climate Specific Energy Rating (CSER). For this purpose, it defines procedures for the experimental determination of input data and algorithms for calculating the CSER. However, some steps leave room for interpretation regarding the specific implementation. To analyze the impact of these ambiguities, the comparability of results and the clarity of the algorithm for calculating the CSER in part 3 of the standard, an intercomparison is performed among research organizations with 10 different implementations of the algorithm. We share the same input data, obtained by measurement of a commercial crystalline silicon PV module, among the participating organizations. Each participant then uses their individual implementations of the algorithm to calculate the resulting CSER values. The initial blind comparison reveals differences of 0.133 (14.7%) in CSER. After several comparison phases, a best practice approach is defined, which reduces the difference by a factor of 210 to below 0.001 (0.1%) in CSER for two independent PV modules. The best practice presented in this paper establishes clear guidelines for the numerical treatment of the spectral correction and power matrix extrapolation, where the methods in the standard are not clearly defined. Additionally, we provide input data and results for the PV community to test their implementations of the standard’s algorithm. To identify the source of the deviations, we introduce a climate data diagnostic set. Based on our experiences, we give recommendations for the future development of the standard.