loading page

CloudSatNet-1: FPGA-based Hardware-Accelerated Quantized CNN for Satellite On-Board Cloud Coverage Classification
  • +2
  • Radoslav Pitonak ,
  • Ján Mucha ,
  • Lukas Dobis ,
  • Martin Javorka ,
  • Marek Marusin
Radoslav Pitonak
Author Profile
Ján Mucha
Brno University of Technology

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Lukas Dobis
Author Profile
Martin Javorka
Author Profile
Marek Marusin
Author Profile


CubeSats, the nanosatellites with a wet mass up to 10 kg, accompanied by the cost decrease of accessing the space, amplified the rapid development of the Earth Observation industry. Acquired image data serve as an essential source of information in various disciplines like environmental protection, geosciences, or the military. As the quantity of remote sensing data grows, the bandwidth resources for the data transmission (downlink) are exhausted. Therefore, new techniques that reduce the downlink utilization of the satellites must be investigated and developed. For that reason, we are presenting CloudSatNet-1: an FPGA based hardware-accelerated quantized convolutional neural network (CNN) for satellite on-board cloud coverage classification. We aim to explore the effects of the quantization process on the proposed CNN architecture. Additionally, the performance of cloud coverage classification by biomes diversity is investigated, and the hardware architecture design space is explored to identify the optimal FPGA resource utilization. Results of this study showed that the weights and activations quantization adds a minor effect on the model performance. Nevertheless, the memory footprint reduction allows the model deployment on low-cost FPGA Xilinx Zynq-7020. Using the RGB bands only, up to 90% of accuracy was achieved, and when omitting the tiles with snow and ice, the performance increased up to 94.4% of accuracy with a low false-positive rate of 2.23% for the 4-bit width model. With the maximum parallelization settings, the hardware accelerator achieved 15 FPS with 2.5W of average power consumption (0.2W increase over the idle state).
02 Jul 2022Published in Remote Sensing volume 14 issue 13 on pages 3180. 10.3390/rs14133180